As a water quality policy person even I am unsure what EPA, TVA, TDEC, and other state and federal groups mean when they say the water is safe at the site of last week’s fly ash spill. Safe for whom or what? Safe to drink? Safe to swim in? Safe for the mussels or other aqautic life? Safe for fishing? In an apparent effort to quell the fears of residents the reports of water quality testing are vague and inadequate to fully detail the impact of this disaster on our water quality, aquatic life, and land use.
The reports released thus far have had conflicting messages. Just yesterday EPA released information stating there are high levels of aresenic in the area of the spill as well as heavy metal levels exceeding drinking water standards. Is this safe? The two streams directly affected by this contamination already suffer water quality impairments from mercury, PCBs, and chlordane. How are these impaired water bodies able to dissipate the intense amount of added pollutants resulting from this spill as some groups have claimed?
It may be some time before we know the true impact of this disaster. It is important for all monitoring to continue, full results be provided to the public, and direct understanding of this situation be advertised. Of the utmost importance at this time is for those agencies in charge to do everything possible to appropriately and adequately clean up this mess and take every step possible to prevent such incidnents from occuring ever again. This type of catastrophe has significant impacts to us, our recreational outlets, our food supply, our drinking water supply, aquatic life, and land use. This is by no means an isolated event to a specific site in our state, but a disaster with the potential to impact the environmental as a whole .