|
|
February 19, 2002
TDEC PRESS RELEASE - Summertown Utility District requests suspension of
permit application
The Board of Commissioners for the Summertown Utility District has asked
the state to temporarily suspend a determination on its application for
a permit to withdraw up to one million gallons per day from the Buffalo
River. In a letter dated December 18, 2001, the district says they need
to use Buffalo River water in the future, but for now they wish to pursue
"coordinated and cooperative regional watershed efforts." The
letter proposes certain steps to be taken to enhance protection of the
river and promote regional planning. Potential inclusion of the Buffalo
in the state scenic river system is specifically mentioned.
An August 7, 2001 public hearing attracted more than 300 people. The majority
of attendees were downstream residents expressing their strong desire
to protect the Buffalo River. Following the public forum, letters from
citizens and conservation groups addressed similar concerns.
"We hope the enthusiasm for the Buffalo River continues," says
Paul E. Davis, Director of TDEC's Division of Water Pollution Control.
"TDEC helped facilitate this decision and we fully agree with the
district on the importance of regional planning."
TDEC will honor Summertown Utility District's request and suspend its
determination on the permit.
February 19, 2002
NEWS ANNOUNCEMENT - TDEC suspends all future inter-basin transfer permits
On January 25, 2002, Justin Wilson, Deputy to the Governor for Policy,
announced that all future inter basin permits will be suspended until
further study. Specifically, Mr. Wilson asked TDEC to: "please
deny any new inter-basin transfer .permit applications received after
the date of this letter until you are confident that all reasonably foreseeable
needs for water under all climatic conditions will be met.
Mr. Wilson says in his letter: "Therefore, please deny any new inter-basin
transfer permit applications received after the date of this letter until
you are confident that all reasonably foreseeable needs for
water under all climatic conditions will be met. Specifically in regard
to making this determination for the Lower Tennessee-Hiwassee River basin,
you should use the TVA study, unless an applicant furnishes the same quality
of information."
CROSSVILLE CHRONICLE
|
'We need to work together'
County, city officials meet to form consensus on future of water
in Cumberland
Published Oct. 16, 2001
By Jim Young
Chronicle staff writer
It had been a long time since Crossville officials and anyone
representing the county water utility districts sat down face-to-face
to discuss raw water supply needs for Cumberland County and the
troubles between the two sides.
Until Thursday.
That's when Crossville City Council members and Cumberland County
Executive Brock Hill met on the matter in Crossville City Hall.
William Mayberry III, former city council member and current chairman
of the board of the Greater Cumberland County Chamber of Commerce,
pulled the meeting together in an attempt to get discussion on
a raw water supply going. A water supply is needed for future
growth of the area to continue.
"Were all aware of the need for water in the future,"
said Mayberry to the group. "The most important part of the
process is the planning and planning is needed now. We all need
to get on the same page and work together for the benefit of the
community."
Mayberry explained that he does not know if the water authority
is the best way to accomplish the community's goals, but it is
a potential vehicle.
"You know were not interested in joining the water authority,"
replied council member Boyd Wyatt. Hill explained that he was
at the meeting for the same reason the city council was. "We're
more than just elected officials, but residents, too," he
said.
Hill explained after Catoosa Utility District was unsuccessful
in its attempt to obtain a permit for a new lake, he talked to
those in Nashville who had said no and asked them how the answer
could made affirmative. Hill listed some of those "hows"
as long-range planning and a joint project to serve all the water
suppliers in the area. A new study, funded by a federal grant,
is under way to show the region's known water needs 50 years into
the future.
Crossville Mayor J.H. Graham III said he understood that a dam
anywhere in Tennessee would be difficult to get. Graham said the
plan is for the city to be the regional purveyor of water.
"When the current set of projects are completed, the city
will have 7 million gallons in the air (in water storage tanks),
7 million gallons in the pipes and a capacity to produce 7 million
gallons a day," detailed Graham. "Within 10 years well
be bumping our head on the peak use of 7 million gallons a day
capacity."
Hill said that, although he serves as the county executive, he
grew up in the city limits of Crossville, owns a business in the
city and still works in the city. "I love Crossville,"
he said. "It's not an 'us vs. them' thing, it's an 'us thing,'
and the bottom line is we're going to run out of water and we
need to work together."
In discussing how the city and the utility districts have been
trying to prepare for future tight water supplies, Hill said he
believes the quickest way from point A to point B is a straight
line. He added what has been going on, though, has been zigzagging,
with one district drilling wells, another looking at building
a treatment plant on a small lake, and one that already has. The
bottom line, according to Hill, is that if the city loses the
utility districts as customers, city customers will pay more for
water while the utility districts are spending money they don't
need to spend.
Graham restated his long-time suggestion that the city and the
regional water authority go into a 50/50 partnership on a raw
water supply project.
"The city of Crossville has bought the community time,"
said Graham. "We've spent a barrel of money and with help
from the state at a low 1.7 percent interest rate.:
Hill responded, "You're doing exactly what you need to do.
And thank you."
The issue of friction between the two sides was also discussed.
"We need to make an effort not to personalize this,"
Hill said. "It has been contentious between the city and
the utility districts, but we've got to sit down and start talking."
The problem is the relationship between the city and the utility
districts, agreed council member Earl Dean.
"People on the street don't think either one of us are doing
anything," said Wyatt. "I know that's not true, but
that's the impression."
Hill said, "The only possible way to have a lake up here
is a joint effort, otherwise a pipeline may be the only way."
Graham turned to Hill. "I've asked the utility districts
to join us. We'll take over their employees, take over their debt
and give their customers a cheaper rate," the mayor said.
"They said, 'No.' Why is that?"
Hill replied, "I don't know."
Hill reminded the group that the Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation continues to hold up the Cumberland Plateau as
a model for future water supply issues in the state.
"The process is going to take several years," said Crossville
City Manager Jack Miller.
No follow-up meeting is scheduled at the present time.
|
What's
a River without Water?
|